Welcome to NGAC
Letter from the President PDF Print E-mail

To the Members of NGAC,

Many of you may have read or hear Secretary of Defense Robert Gates’ recent speeches regarding the imminent future decline in defense budgets.  Although, Secretary Gates acknowledged that he intends to look within his own department for savings to offset declining budgets; I cannot help but to feel concerned for the second and third order of budgetary effects on the California National Guard operating budget.

Institutional knowledge and experience tells me that the potential bill payers will indirectly be the soldiers and airmen of the National Guard. I am told that among the suggested contributors to the savings plan are retiree health care fees and co-pays, and your pay and benefits increases.  

I appears to me that the Department of Defense (DoD) should reduce health costs by eliminating inefficiencies in administration, contracting, and procurement opposed to the easier course of tapping the beneficiaries benefits. 

Additionally, at a time when our units are engaged in fighting two wars, our citizen airmen and soldiers are dying on battlefields around the world, and the pay gap is not yet closed, attempts to trim budget shortfalls at the expense of military pay and benefits would appear to be tremendously misguided.  Imagine the impact on morale that almost flat paychecks would have on soldiers driving on explosives-lined roads in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Budget corrections should not come from military personnel accounts and benefits.  Our National Guard service members count – and to maintain high recruiting and retention rates, we must not cut quality of life benefits.  We owe it to our brave service members who are in harm’s way, not to use their pay and benefits for budget-cutting target practice.

Finally, in the myriad news articles that have followed Secretary Gates’ recent budget-related speeches, reference has been made to veterans groups “pushing Congress to provide increasingly generous benefits including concurrent receipt”.  Concurrent receipt refers to disabled service members who, in order to receive veterans compensation for injury or disease incurred while protecting our nation, must give up part of their retirement pay earned by giving at least 20 years of service to include the willingness to give up their life.  Urging Congress to allow the concurrent receipt of these two very different compensation elements, earned by disabled veterans who might well have died during their service, hardly seems to fall into the category of increasingly generous benefits.  The generosity comes from the patriotic and brave service members – all volunteers - who give up seeing their families for years at a time, who miss birthdays, anniversaries, little league games, school plays, the birth of their children and the death of aged parents, in order to protect all Americans and our way of life.

I understand that during this time of enormous national budget deficits, prudent use of our fiscal resources is in order.  However, in a country as richly blessed as ours, surely there are ways to exercise fiscal responsibility without dipping into the pockets of volunteer soldiers, retirees and veterans.

Kelly Fisher

President, NGAC
 

 

 
Watchdogs Labor To Expose Liars About Military Exploits PDF Print E-mail

Kansas City Star

July 25, 2010 

 

Watchdogs Labor To Expose Liars About Military Exploits

By Lee Hill Kavanaugh, The Kansas City Star

Army Capt. Joshua Howard, a physician’s assistant at Fort Riley, Kan., ran across the newspaper story online about a Korean War veteran who was to be inducted into the Kansas National Guard Hall of Fame.

In the accompanying photo, the veteran wore a khaki shirt covered with ribbons and medals, black bars and stripes.

The story told how this veteran had received the military’s No. 2 and 3 awards for valor — the Distinguished Service Cross and the Silver Star — along with two Purple Hearts, one pinned on by Gen. Douglas MacArthur. And how he had been a prisoner of war in Korea for 5½ months.

But the more Howard read, the more “those medals and his account of it all didn’t add up,” he said.

He called friends to ask about the different medals. He e-mailed the photo and story. He wanted to know.

“I work with guys here who have PTSD, soldiers who have lost legs and stuff, and they don’t have these super-cool medals and badges,” Howard said.

Within days, the veteran’s face stared out from several websites, with other veterans questioning whether he was a real hero or a fake.

It is a question that is being asked more and more these days.

“It’s an epidemic of military fakers and liars out there,” said Mary Schantag of Branson, who has made it her job to expose fake POWs.

So far this year, Schantag and her retired Marine husband, Chuck, have received requests to check almost 8,000 names to verify POW claims. Last year, they ran more than 14,000 names.

The Schantags, along with Vietnam veteran Doug Sterner of Virginia, are members of the 22-member Stolen Valor Task Force, a group of veterans and military researchers across the country who share information to expose military impostors.

Self-taught experts, they collect tidbits of information every day from dozens of sources; file Freedom of Information requests; and gather notes from general orders, historical accounts and prisoner of war records. They scrutinize the material, cross-check it with other sources and build databases.

Their goal is to have a searchable repository of all earned medals of valor. A place where the public can read stories about heroes who otherwise might be forgotten.

Every one of the task force members knew a real hero who made the ultimate sacrifice for their country.

And every one has vowed to stop those who would steal another’s valor.

It was task force members who pushed Congress to approve the 2006 Stolen Valor Act, which strengthened existing laws covering the unauthorized wearing of or laying claim to military decorations. The act made it a crime to lie about one’s military service.

The law is being challenged on First Amendment free speech grounds in several states. It was upheld in California. But last week in Colorado, a federal judge dismissed a case against a man who falsely claimed he was a Marine captain who had been wounded while serving in Iraq and had received a Purple Heart and a Silver Star.

U.S. District Judge Robert Blackburn said the law unconstitutionally punished speech based on its content without a compelling government interest to justify the restriction. The decision set precedent only in Colorado, but it may open up more challenges nationwide.

Out of the thousands of people who have lied about or exaggerated their service, Sterner said, only about 55 have been prosecuted for false valor claims, and most have not received stiff punishments.

Last month, federal prosecutors agreed to drop a Stolen Valor charge against Timothy J. Watkins of Kansas City, North, if he completed 18 months of pretrial supervision without a problem. As part of the diversion agreement, Watkins agreed that he had lied about his military history and receiving the Purple Heart and Silver Star.

Some may look at these cases and ask: What’s the big deal? Who cares if the stories aren’t true? What harm is done?

But many veterans are outraged every time a military faker is exposed. They see a crime against the honor of those who really did charge up hills, wipe out machine-gun positions, drag wounded buddies to safety and endure terrible wounds — or even death.

Every valor award comes at a very high cost, said John V. Lilyea, a retired Army sergeant first class in West Virginia who runs the website This Ain’t Hell, But You Can See It From Here.

“We’re so tired of these guys who say they’re heroes and they’re really fakers,” he said.

Lilyea said he has had to tell grieving families that a loved one could not be buried with military honors because he had lied about his service.

“If we catch them while they’re alive, they have a chance to explain it and maybe redeem themselves,” he said.

***

The Schantags, who split their time between homes in Branson and Skidmore, Mo., founded the POW Network ( www.pownetwork.org ).

The nonprofit is not affiliated with the government, nor is it paid for its work. Mary Schantag said the operation functions solely on donations. It is a labor of love for the couple.

And there is plenty of labor to do.

Twenty years ago, the Schantags considered two dozen names a year to be a high number. Now they get about three dozen requests a day.

On certain days of the year, the phone rings nearly nonstop.

“The three worst days for us are the days after Memorial Day, Fourth of July and Veterans Day,” Mary Schantag said.

Prime days for reminiscing about past glories — real or not.

When the Schantags started this work in 1989, their goal was only to find missing former POWs. But something happened along the way.

“We started finding out about a lot of phonies and fakers,” she said.

***

Sterner believes in heroes. He believes in their ability to inspire. He believes their stories should be told, remembered and treasured.

But the military, while keeping miles of paper records, had never put them into a searchable online database.

So Sterner set out to create his own. Over the past 16 years, he has compiled in one database all the information he could find on the recipients of the military’s top three awards for valor: the Medal of Honor, the Distinguished Service Cross (including the Navy Cross and Air Force Cross) and the Silver Star.

It is slow, slogging work. Last year, with donations not keeping up with costs, he nearly had to close it down. But the Military Times newspaper saw its value and bought the database from him. Sterner is now its main curator.

The database — at www.militarytimes.com/hallofvalor is easily searchable, with every Medal of Honor and Distinguished Service Cross citation from every war the U.S. has fought in. (The compilation of Silver Stars is not yet complete.)

The process of tracking down military records is daunting. Some information is buried in the files of an entire unit instead of those of individuals. Some records were lost in a 1973 fire in a military records center in St. Louis.

But Sterner has made a home in cyberspace for the really big honors. Future generations can read what their loved ones did, Sterner said, “so we won’t forget.”

A few years ago, Sterner helped a Kansas City woman confirm her deceased father’s heroism. Twenty-three years after his death, the family received a funeral for him with full military honors in Arlington National Cemetery.

But what Sterner started as a way to help the public remember military heroes has become the go-to resource for verifying or disproving accounts of valor.

“I have never found Doug’s site to be inaccurate,” said Tom Cottone Jr., a former FBI agent in Washington, D.C.

Cottone, who retired two years ago, spent 14 years ferreting out military impostors, focusing mostly on those who falsely claimed to be Medal of Honor recipients. Sterner, he said, “is extremely careful and diligent when he puts someone’s record on the site.”

And if someone’s name is not there, that says a lot, too.

***

The Korean veteran’s story, published in April in a Kansas newspaper, illustrates how fast an account can spread, catching the eyes of veterans and watchdogs within days.

The story told about the veteran’s pending induction into the Kansas National Guard Hall of Fame, an honor for which he had been nominated by city officials and others in his hometown.

He is a local hero, representing veterans in parades and the honor guard, playing taps, folding the flag to present to widows at funerals.

He also is in poor health, his family says. (The Kansas City Star is not publishing his name because he has not been charged under the Stolen Valor Act.)

The story included, word for word, two sentences from the framed medal citations the veteran displayed in his office.

Watchdog groups and other veterans pored over the photograph, scrutinizing the medals. Some filed Freedom of Information requests to corroborate or expose his claims, searching archives and the National Personnel Records Center and reports for general order numbers from the citations for his Distinguished Service Cross and Silver Star.

No one found any evidence that the Kansan had received the awards he claimed, or been a POW, or even seen combat. His records indicated he was in Korea about a month.

“This guy … had so many red flags I couldn’t believe that no one had questioned him before,” Mary Schantag said.

“The first thing everybody noticed was that (he) refused to show proof of his records. Most guys, despite being reluctant, will show what they did because it means so much. … It costs so much in human terms to get these awards.

“He showed it only to his family and the friends who went into his office … until he was (to be) inducted into the hall of fame.”

Other veterans said they asked the Kansan to release his military records with his privacy sections redacted. It would still show his awards and honors.

He refused, they said.

Officials at the Guard Hall of Fame said the veteran told them that he had asked the military to not put his honors on his records because he did not deserve them.

That made veterans doubt his story more.

Meanwhile, in Topeka, Doug Jacobs, board president of the Guard Hall of Fame, started his own investigation, calling and writing military offices, trying to get the elusive records to “prove this man’s innocence,” he said.

Days later, Jacobs received a phone message from Arlington, Va.

The voice was that of Sterner. The Star had asked Sterner to run through his database two sentences from the veteran’s Distinguished Service Cross, or DSC, citation.

From the 812 DSC narratives from the Korean War, the computer made one hit: a word-for-word match with a passage describing one man’s heroism.

And it was not the Kansas veteran’s.

It was that of Army Sgt. 1st Class Richard J. Hartnett, who had gone back to Pennsylvania after the war and died in 2003.

The Star then called back the reporter who had written the original story. The reporter had taped the hourlong interview and had photocopied the medal citations from the nominee’s office wall.

As The Star began to read Hartnett’s entire citation, the other reporter gasped. Except for the name, date and location, they were identical.

Sterner then ran the Kansan’s Silver Star citation through the same screening process. Again, just one hit.

This one came from another DSC citation. The recipient: Army Cpl. Fabian Nieves-Laguer. He was a member of the famous “Borinqueneers,” the 65th Infantry Regiment from Puerto Rico.

It took Sterner’s computer 14 seconds to make the match.

“Gosh, he didn’t even bother to write his own wording,” said Sterner. “This shows so clearly the value in a database that documents these awards.

“Without it, this would have taken months or even years to find, and that’s if we would have ever found it.”

The Star tried to talk to the Kansas veteran, but he did not return calls.

***

In her home in Jonestown, Pa., Delores Hartnett, widow of Richard Hartnett, listened as The Star told her how another man appeared to have adopted her husband’s medal citation as his own.

She was speechless at first.

Her husband rarely talked about his service in Korea, she said. But after the Korean War, he enlisted in the Pennsylvania National Guard, serving for 25 years. He once told her that he did what he had to do to serve his country.

The couple had five children and seven grandchildren. She does not visit his grave on Memorial Day because “he’s in my heart every day, every moment,” she said.

But she can imagine what her husband would have said about a case of stolen valor.

“To steal someone else’s heroics, what they fought for, and watched friends die for, this is absolutely pitiful … pitiful, pitiful, pitiful!”

***

Jacobs of the Guard Hall of Fame said recently that the Kansas veteran’s family has withdrawn his nomination. He will not be inducted into the hall.

The hall has changed its rules regarding information that emerges after a nominee’s induction has been announced, Jacobs said. Before, there was no provision to prevent a nominee who had been accepted from being inducted.

Mary Schantag said she has forwarded information about the veteran to the FBI. Not just his name, but a folder with everything the Schantags gathered.

“That’s standard for us. It’s against the law to wear a medal that you didn’t earn because they come at such a high human cost.

“You know, if these people told just one lie, they might get away with it. But they’ve got to be better and more than everyone else.

“What they fail to understand is that just by serving and doing what they were told to do, whether they saw combat or sat behind the scenes in an office, is extraordinary.

“That’s good enough to be a hero.”

A harrowing narrative of bravery

Here is an excerpt from Richard J. Hartnett’s Distinguished Service Cross citation:

Sergeant First Class Hartnett distinguished himself by extraordinary heroism in action against enemy aggressor forces in the vicinity of Chorwon, Korea, on 29 September 1951.

On that date, Sergeant Hartnett’s company was assigned the mission of attacking a numerically superior hostile force occupying well-fortified hill positions.

Commanding the lead squad of this assault, Sergeant Hartnett had maneuvered his men to within a few yards of the enemy emplacements when a heavy volume of machine-gun fire halted their advance.

Unhesitatingly, Sergeant Hartnett charged directly into the intense enemy fire, hurling grenades and firing his rifle. His aggressive action neutralized the hostile emplacement, but his attack also attracted the attention of the enemy troops occupying another bunker who immediately directed their fire against the friendly force.

Sergeant Hartnett single-handedly assaulted the emplacement, this time destroying its weapon and killing the occupants. Observing another enemy position, he fearlessly charged a third time and eliminated it.

His courageous actions were directly responsible for the collapse of the enemy defenses and enabled his company to take its objective with a minimum of casualties.

The psychology of a great temptation — embellishment

We are all likely to embroider personal stories to make ourselves appear a bit brighter or funnier or more interesting than we think we are, said John Wisner, a psychiatrist at the University of Kansas Hospital.

“That’s human nature. It’s a tremendous human temptation,” he said.

But people cross the line on deception when they can’t understand the value of telling the truth, or they get caught up in living a story that isn’t true, Wisner said.

“Oftentimes people do it for love or esteem from other people,” he said. “There are people who can’t allow themselves to be perceived as who they are and have to make things up. They feel empty and hollow as who they are and have to embellish.”

Military service is a particularly attractive way to boost one’s image, Wisner said.

“It implies machismo and bravery. For the average American, military service is the one way available to show valor.”

Wisner was on staff at the Kansas City VA Medical Center more than 20 years. He met many who acted heroically and were wounded in the line of duty. Rarely did he find someone who exaggerated what he had done.

“If they talk about it, they do it with a degree of humility and even reluctance,” Wisner said.

 

 
Welcome Letter PDF Print E-mail

A Welcome from Kelly Fisher,
NGAC President
  

Welcome. We are committed to creating and maintaining an effective means for telling the California National Guard story and providing for a strong presence and voice before our legislature and our Congress.

Don't hesitate to contact ngac.org if you have suggestions that would make your visit on our Web site more informative and enjoyable. 

 

 
Frequently Asked Questions re: Military Leave PDF Print E-mail

 

Frequently Asked Questions
on Military Leave

Also see: Military Leave Fact Sheet


Q1:

Under what conditions is a Federal employee who is called to active duty as a member of the National Guard or Reserves entitled to military leave?

alt
alt

A1:

Employees who are called to active duty in support of the ongoing national emergency are entitled to military leave under two separate provisions.

A Federal employee who is a member of the National Guard or Reserves is entitled to 15 days (120 hours) of paid military leave under 5 U.S.C. 6323(a) each fiscal year for active duty, active duty training, or inactive duty training. An employee on military leave under section 6323(a) receives his or her full civilian salary, as well as military pay. This leave accrues at the beginning of each fiscal year, and all Guard or Reserve members, including those on extended active duty, should be credited with 15 days of paid military leave on October 1 of each year.

An agency now may charge military leave under 6323 (a) only for hours the employee otherwise would have worked. An employee no longer "loses leave" on weekends and other nonworkdays and will be paid his or her full civilian pay for all 120 hours. (See fact sheet on Military Leave at http://www.opm.gov/oca/leave/HTML/military.asp. This guidance does not apply to employees of the U.S. Postal Service.)

In addition, effective November 24, 2003, employees who perform full-time military service as a result of a call or order to active duty in support of a contingency operation* as defined in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code, are entitled to 22 days of military leave under 5 U.S.C. 6323(b). Under this provision the employee is entitled to the greater of his military or civilian pay. (See Question 6.)

Employees also are entitled to use any accrued or accumulated annual leave for periods of active military duty. Employees using annual leave will receive their full civilian pay, as well as compensation for their military service.

alt

Q2:

May an employee on active duty or active/inactive duty training choose to use annual leave, military leave, earned compensatory time off for travel, or sick leave intermittently with leave without pay (LWOP) each pay period?

alt
alt

A2:

Yes. OPM's regulations at 5 CFR 353.208 implementing the Uniformed Service Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) state that an employee performing service with the uniformed services must be permitted, upon request, to use any accrued annual leave, military leave, earned compensatory time off for travel, or accrued sick leave (consistent with the statutory and regulatory criteria for using sick leave), during such service. An employee is entitled to use annual leave, military leave, earned compensatory time off for travel, or sick leave intermittently with leave without pay while on active duty or active/inactive duty training.

alt

Q3:

When are employees eligible for an additional 22 days of military leave?

alt
New

A3:

There are two conditions under which employees are entitled to an additional 22 days of military leave under the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 6323(b). Reservists or National Guard members who perform military duty in support of civil authorities in the protection of life and property are eligible for an additional 22 workdays of military leave. In addition, effective November 24, 2003, employees who perform full-time military service as a result of a call or order to active duty in support of a contingency operation* as defined in section 101(a)(13) of title 10, United States Code, are entitled to 22 days of military leave under 5 U.S.C. 6323(b).

alt

Q4:

I have an employee who is a military policeman in the Reserves. He is being activated to perform base security at Andrews AFB. Is he entitled to the additional 22 days of military leave?

alt
New

A4:

Yes. Effective November 24, 2003, all employees who have been activated in support of the national emergency declared by the President are entitled to the 22 days of military leave under 5 U.S.C. 6323(b).

alt

Q5:

I have an employee who is a member of the National Guard. His unit has been activated, at the request of the Governor of his State, to provide additional security at local airports. Is he entitled to the additional 22 days of military leave?

alt
alt

A5:

Yes. The President has authorized the Governors of several States and territories to use National Guard forces to provide supplemental security personnel for airport operations. Guard members ordered to such duty under 32 U.S.C. 502(f) are clearly assisting civil authorities in the protection of life and property. Therefore, in addition to military leave available under 5 U.S.C. 6323(a) for active duty and active and inactive duty training, a member of the National Guard also may be authorized military leave under 5 U.S.C. 6323(b) for assisting civil authorities in the protection of life and property.

alt

Q6:

Are employees entitled to both their military and civilian pay during periods of military leave taken under 5 U.S.C. 6323(b) in support of civil authorities or of the national emergency?

alt
alt

A6:

No. An employee is entitled to the greater of his civilian or military pay, not both. Under 5 U.S.C. 5519, the military pay received by an individual who has been activated in support of civil authorities or a contingency operation must be credited (less any travel, transportation, or other per diem allowances) against any Federal civilian pay the employee received during the 22 workdays of military leave. An agency may calculate the amount of military pay (less any travel, transportation, or per diem allowances) an employee will receive for the time period that corresponds to the 22 workdays of military leave and reduce the employee's civilian pay by that amount during the 22 workdays of military leave. In contrast, many agencies choose to continue to pay the employee his or her full civilian pay during the 22 workdays of military leave. At the end of the 22-day period of military leave, the agency requires the employee to refund to the agency an amount equal to the amount of military pay received (less any travel, transportation, or per diem allowances) up to the amount of his or her civilian pay for the time period that corresponds to the 22 workdays of military leave.

alt

Q7:

May a Federal civilian employee who has been called to active duty continue to work as a civilian at his or her Federal agency?

alt
alt

A7:

No. The Comptroller General has ruled that an individual on active duty military service may not be employed in a civilian capacity with the Government. The Comptroller General has held that the rendition of services to the Government in a civilian capacity by a member of the armed services on active duty is incompatible with the member's actual or potential military duties and payment for such services is not authorized in the absence of specific statutory authority. This is the case even though the civilian services are rendered during the military member's hours of relaxation or time provided to attend to personal affairs. (See 64 Comp. Gen. 395, 399-400 (1985), and 47 Comp. Gen. 505-506 (1968).)

alt

Q8:

Is a member of the National Guard of the District of Columbia eligible for additional military leave under 5 U.S.C. 6323(c)?

alt
alt

A8:

Yes. However, military leave under 5 U.S.C.6323(c) may be used only for limited purposes. A Federal civilian employee who is also a member of the DC National Guard is entitled to additional military leave as provided in 5 U.S.C. 6323(c) to participate in a "parade or encampment." The law provides that this type of duty must be authorized under title 39 of the District of Columbia Code. Generally, this category of military leave is limited to drills and training under the authority of the Commanding General of the DC National Guard and is not appropriate for extended active duty in connection with the current national emergency.

alt

Q9:

What kinds of personnel actions should an agency process when an employee is using annual leave, military leave, earned compensatory time off for travel, sick leave, and/or leave without pay while performing duties with the uniformed services?

alt
alt

A9:

Agencies do not need to process any personnel actions (SF 50s) for periods of annual leave, military leave, earned compensatory time off for travel, or sick leave since the payroll system documents an employee's use of paid leave. Agencies should document an employee's use of leave without pay (LWOP) to perform duty with the uniformed services by processing a personnel action (SF 50) using nature of action "LWOP-US" (nature of action code 473). The effective date is the first day the employee begins to use leave without pay for duty with the uniformed services.

Employees may use annual leave, military leave, compensatory time off for travel, or sick leave (consistent with the statutory and regulatory criteria for using sick leave), intermittently with leave without pay while performing duty with the uniformed services. OPM does not require that agencies process return-to-duty actions for each period of paid leave. Periods of "LWOP-US" may be interrupted by periods of annual leave or military leave without the need to process any additional personnel actions.

alt

Q10:

We have an employee who has been on military leave without pay (LWOP-US) since October 2001. He is requesting to be paid for his 15 days of military leave for the new fiscal year. Is he entitled to this?

alt
alt

A10: 

Yes. An employee who is a member of the Reserves or National Guard serving on active military duty which extends into a second or succeeding fiscal year may accrue and use the 15 days of military leave which accrue at the beginning of the second fiscal year and each succeeding fiscal year without return to civilian status. In addition, an employee who has been activated in support of the national emergency whose duty extends into the next calendar year will be entitled to up to an additional 22 days of military leave under 6323(b).


* The term "contingency operation" means a military operation that -

    (a) is designated by the Secretary of Defense as an operation in which members of the armed forces are or may become involved in military actions, operations, or hostilities against an enemy of the United States or against an opposing military force; or
    (b) results in the call or order to, or retention on, active duty of members of the uniformed services under section 688, 12301(a), 12302, 12304, 12305, or 12406 of title 10, United States Code, chapter 15 of title 10, United States Code, or any other provision of law during a war or during a national emergency declared by the President or Congress.

This page can be found on the web at the following url: http://www.opm.gov/oca/leave/html/milqa.asp

 
PDF Help U.S. Office of Personnel Management 1900 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20415 | (202) 606-1800 | TTY (202) 606-2532

 

 
Establishment of a Photo Archive at the Museum PDF Print E-mail

It’s time for spring cleaning!  Still have lots of photos from AT at Camp Roberts, Camp San Luis Obispo or Fort Irwin?  Is your digital camera or computer full of photos from your last deployment? Need to get rid of all that history in the bottom of your closet?

Well, the California National Guard has established a Joint Image Library at the California State Military Museum.  The library will collect, conserve and make available to the historians, researchers and the general public,  photographs and digital images depicting the military history of the State of California in general and the California National Guard (to include the Militia, Volunteers, State Guard, State Military Reserve, and Naval Militia) in particular.

Those units and individuals who wish to donate photo albums or digital images on CD/DVD/Flash Drive should prepare a photo log or at write on the reverse of the photograph with a No. 2 or softer pencil as much information as possible about the image.

Photographs in albums will be removed, conserved and placed into archival sleeves and binders.  Those albums donated by an individual will have their contents kept together when possible in a separate binder and cataloged as a separate collection and named after the donor.  An example is provided as noted below:

49th Separate Infantry Brigade:  SFC John Doe Collection, Headquarters and Headquarters Company Annual Training Camp San Luis Obispo, 1970

The museum is also maintaining images of California installations, ships  with California names (USS California, USS Los Angeles, USS Mariano Vallejo, etc.) and those military units and individuals with strong California ties (i.e. 91st Division, GEN George Patton, Fleet Admiral Chester Nimitz, etc.)

Separate photographs, CD/DVDs, Flash Drives, and or Photo Albums should be sent to the California State Military Museum, ATTN: Joint Image Library, 1119 2nd Street, Sacramento, CA  95814

The finding aid for this image library is located at www.militarymuseum.org/imagelibrary.html.

 

 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>

Page 1 of 4